The Pope's Exorcist

The Pope’s Exorcist starts out entertainingly with the character of an unconventional, rebellious priest interestingly portrayed by the great Russell Crow. And then it is all the more unentertaining due to its impetuous piling up of genre clichés in the final third, which is more ridiculous than scary or in any way impressive. The film’s best scene, with which the still watchable and still developing part of the storyline culminates, is somewhere around the midpoint. A mainstream movie powered by a stellar cast, but in the context of the genre, it’s a total fiasco in comparison with some cinematic delights that don’t even make it into local theaters (X, Pearl). (15/04/2023)

I have a soft spot for supernatural themes, so I'm giving this one an extra star. Without Russell Crowe, it might feel like a B-movie, but he elevates it. Julius Avery did a fantastic job technically, and I'm glad someone other than James Wan tackled an exorcism horror. It shows that this genre can be approached differently. While James Wan's exorcism films have become a bit stale and recycled, this one worked pretty well for me. It's not the scariest, but with Russell in the lead and based on a true story, it adds a solid legend to the mix. Overall, I'm satisfied. (23/10/2023)

Just another exorcism movie. Or another generic genre addition that unfortunately spits out all its plot and reveals all the demon scenes in the trailer and has nothing to dazzle with. Russell Crowe is a nice change from the jaded Mr. and Mrs. Warren, and his role as a satirical rebel priest is solid, but otherwise it's just a classic template that doesn't stand out in any aspect. Visually fine, atmospherically average and kind of middle of the road in terms of craftsmanship. I expected more. (24/04/2023)

Congratulations to the filmmakers for finding a meaningful reason to make the thousandth exorcism horror film with the potential for epic expansion into sequels. However, I won’t congratulate them for not being scared of their own idea, and without flinching, follow a template we’ve seen a thousand times before. A template entertaining and well executed enough to be worth watching, but a template nonetheless. Russell Crowe is very good, some of the visual effects and the generic demonic voice not so. (03/05/2023)

Julius Avery hit the mark again. Overlord, set during World War II, already had a lot to offer, and now he’s ventured into the challenging realm of exorcism. The casting of the lead actor was a brilliant move. Russell Crowe excelled in the role of the sarcastic and witty Vatican exorcist (I’ll need to find out more about this character). The entire film essentially stands or falls on his performance. Hats off to him... The film also features numerous scenes where you definitely won’t be laughing; the creators played with my genuinely unstable nerves with precision :D. Audiovisually, it’s top-notch (considering the modest budget of 18 million dollars, it’s a flawless final product), and the sound was perfected (Jed Kurzel did not disappoint). And if it veered more into action territory towards the end? Why not... I haven’t seen anything similar in the genre, so I welcomed it with open arms. I thoroughly enjoyed it. Next time, just fewer kids, who can ruin the whole experience with the rustling of chips and popcorn. Honestly, I don’t understand... For me, it’s 7.5/10 (I might rate it higher over time... a second viewing will decide). (24/04/2023)