Minority Report

Minority Report is an intelligent, well-plotted and visually captivating blockbuster whose plot continuity unfortunately loses the necessary harmony in the crucial final third of the movie. It is also a purely commercial flick which, on the one hand, elevates mediocre entertainment to a higher level but, on the other hand, “wastes” the excellent subject matter and the creative talent of two brilliant filmmakers (Steven Spielberg and Janusz Kaminski). They had the potential to create a once-in-a-decade gem of the genre. (03/10/2002)

[SPOILER, or possibly only an erroneous minority report] ____ The paradox of “Minority Report” consists in the fact that we are so accustomed to kitschy Hollywood endings that they merely amuse or annoy us rather than leading us to question them because of their formulaic and clichéd nature. As the reviews and responses to this film suggest, most people just throw their hands up at the end of Spielberg’s film, expressing that it is simply a typical mainstream flick with the edges smoothed out into total conformist insipidness supported by screenwriting crutches. But what if the smooth denouement and sugar-coated ending is instead meant to offend and provoke us? Perhaps we will start to question the final shot of the idyll with the cottage and the tractor as being blatantly illusory. We might realise that the final twenty minutes of the film have a different colour palette and lighting than the preceding two hours. Particularly obsessive viewers may then look for ten differences in the production design and costumes used in those concluding passages and the depictions of them earlier in the film. Did we seriously think that Spielberg would bring shame onto himself by being the absolute only one to adapt a book by the master of paranoid sci-fi into a form of a dull sop for the supposed majority audience? Unlike with Total Recall, this time we don’t get a literal statement that maybe something is out of place. Here the uncertainty is many times more subtle, because the vehicle for the Dickian twist is the intentionally applied Hollywood tameness, naïveté and formulaicness. After all, we should also be struck by the fact that the naïve ending isn’t conspicuously inconsistent with the bizarreness of many of the preceding passages. But perhaps the presence of these eccentricities alongside the exceptionally smooth genre passages steer us toward further uncertainty. What if the protagonist, and with him the film itself, had not let himself be merely lulled into a dream fulfilled, but had untethered himself from “reality” much earlier and had given preference to the improved comfort of the drugs? In any case, Spielberg made a fantastic and fascinating movie that, perhaps even more than other sci-fi narratives, remains reliant on viewers’ willingness to accept its rules and stop doubting, instead allowing themselves to be carried away by the motifs and ideas that it presents. (13/09/2023)

Yes! If you forget Dick's original story, which is a long way off, Spielberg has made a completely riveting sci-fi with a rather possibly visionary view of the future, when our ideas will be under control and we are punished for crimes we will not be able to commit. The story is not based on action scenes (but the few sequences are worth it), but rather on a well-constructed story with a surprising point. Unfortunately, the point is over extended in a Spielbergian way, and the film loses steam at the end and kind of loses its head. At least it keeps part of its core. In the end, the film and Cruise (almost) are excellent! (25/01/2004)

One of my favorite movies by Steven Spielberg, which has a brilliant concept as its foundation. The fact that Spielberg turned it into a popcorn entertainment is one thing. However, he still managed to stay true to the main idea and there is always something more than just entertainment. Preventing crimes before they are actually committed is truly an idea that holds a lot of potential. It could possibly be exploited even further than just being mostly an action spectacle, but sometimes that's enough. In this case, it is. (27/01/2014)

Spielberg, instead of taking a moment to think about the lazy script cobbled together from the most unique ingredients and solutions, hired representatives from technology schools, companies, and organizations to give him an expert opinion on likely technological developments by 2050. The result is a very outlandish vision of the future, with giant talking advertisements, singing cornflakes, and funny spiders that crawl up under people's duvets whenever the cop of the great evil state waves his hand. It makes any 1960s sci-fi forecast look considerably more realistic next to it, whereas this is really just a relic of Cruise’s profile period. But it's a fact that I have to admire Kaminski for taking his penchant for analogue color desaturation to such an extreme in a high-budget sci-fi film that it ends up looking like a movie rip from 2010. (17/01/2022)