Underwater

Trailer 1

Plots(1)

After disaster strikes miles beneath the ocean's surface, a deep-sea research crew faces the monstrous consequences of what their drilling has unleashed. (Netflix)

Videos (6)

Trailer 1

Reviews (13)

lamps 

all reviews of this user

English This 1980s premise in a modern audiovisual conception is not bad, and it’s actually helped by the casting of Kristen Stewart, who might not be Ripley, but she doesn’t look half bad with a boyish haircut and in underwear. Another good thing is the absence of exposition and the breakneck pace that promises what is probably the most honest horror since Event Horizon, this time, though, in an attractive and nonetheless atmospheric submarine setting. But then there are things that are not downright horrible, but due to the darkness itself and the wild editing, you can barely see what’s happening in about 60% of the scenes, and the most action-packed passage is followed by a lull that irreparably pushes all the tension below the level of the excellent beginning. What is funny at times, too, is the total disregard of otherwise clearly defined physical laws, but that is something I can forgive as part of the premise. The monster is creepy, though a little too sci-fi (something terrifying could live at a depth of 11 km, but it should be more realistic) and the ending is fine. It’s ideal as something to watch with friends, but that’s all the praise I can give it. 65% ()

Marigold 

all reviews of this user

English A promising introduction. Although rather than a film, it resembles effective cinematics in a survival game that I would like to play, but it does fulfill its purpose. I am quite susceptible to underwater anxiety, so as long as something is going on, I'll enjoy a very flimsy expedition and a high amount of deliberately raw filming. But then… uh-oh. The alternative tagline should read: there is nothing to see under the water, which I would have preferred if it hadn't been accompanied by stupid and terribly confusing editing. It prevents a person from enjoying the underwater terror, because here and there, it is not clear where you are who you are actually watching. In addition, the characters are such dull, forgettable reflections. The perpetrator of terror has about five different forms and it is not entirely clear where the creators are trying to take us - to alternative underwater biology, or full-blown sci-fi horror? The conclusion rushes with the answer in the form of Lovecraft kohlrabi and I have to laugh. Mixing so many good things into such a dull goulash truly requires giant blenders. Unfortunately for Underwater, the film is full of them. It doesn't even work as a fun one-time watch. It’s about as much fun as snorkeling in a pond. Regarding B-movie flooding, I will continue to prescribe the beautiful Verne misstep, which has Balls. ()

Ads

J*A*S*M 

all reviews of this user

English If there was a glut of underwater monster horror films in the cinemas, I may have complained that Underwater has poorly drawn characters, that the space and the action are sometimes hard to navigate, and that it doesn’t bring anything new to the sub-genre. But given that the last in any way comparable competition is 1989’s Leviathan, I won’t be a douchebag. And it’s also nice to go to watch a horror flick with a sea monster and get an excellently crafted genre film that doesn’t waste time and jumps right into an intensive action, basically the moment the lights in the theatre go out. The money can be seen. Eubank has once again proven that they can manage the visual aspect of filmmaking with panache. In terms of ambition, however, Underwater is probably the most mundane of their filmography, but this is certainly to the benefit of their cause. But for me, the main plus are the best designed monsters far and wide. ()

D.Moore 

all reviews of this user

English Underwater is most often compared to Alien (and rightly so, as some of the scenes are more than inspired), but I think the filmmakers would have been happy if it was also compared to Gravity. Indeed, several times they try to evoke the mood of the first film mentioned, several times the second, but somehow it doesn't come together and it's all only half as interesting. A number of scenes have a nice gloomy atmosphere but aren't very suspenseful. Some scenes are really well acted, like the one where a stressed Kristen Stewart recounts what happened to Vincent Cassel. And the final super-monster scene is fine too, although we don't really enjoy it and everything ends as expected. I was hoping it would be a little better. ()

POMO 

all reviews of this user

English The best thing about Underwater is Kristen Stewart, and that’s not an exaggeration. The unusual image suited her speech very well. And the pop song in the closing credits is confirmation that the main intention was to draw in her fans. Atmospherically, the film works quite well and the way it dynamically draws the viewer into the plot is outstanding, but it gradually runs out of gas and shuffling around on the place is supposed to unleash the mediocre monsters. The motif of the environmental threat of drilling into the ocean floor isn’t exactly innovative and there is nothing here to make it anything special, so it just remains a worn-out cliché. ()

Gallery (19)