The Impossible

It hit me very hard. Maybe I’m getting soft in my old age. Perfectly played characters, neither Naomi Watts nor Ewan McGregor are trying to be falsely nice, the kids (like in reality) are sometimes begging for a spanking, but things rarely get out of hand. You can’t tell that when the wave washes everything away that it’s special effects. I don’t understand how they could film this so well without demolishing a hotel and defiling a bit of Thailand coastline. The introductory mayhem is replaced by emotionally draining search for the family split up by the catastrophe. And you know how everybody lies, saying they didn’t cry at the end of Titanic? That applies here for a whole half of the movie. The Impossible is a sincere tear-jerker with a powerful ending. Bayona is a director I will have to look out for in the future. His style turned a regular disaster movie into a breath-taking event where chills run up and down your spine, you feel nauseous and at the end you’re be so relieved that later you will cuddle up tight to your better half, female or male. I’m scared too. (05/02/2013)

Finally, in this flood of dry and by-the-numbers award catchers, there is a film with heart that you can enjoy without a theoretical analysis. Impressive, intense, brilliantly made (the tsunami scene!) and touching like nothing in many years. Of course, sometimes the story is very clearly modified for the needs of the script (the casual mass reunion reminded me a little to the similarly made-up phone call in Argo). But when it works so well, who cares. (06/01/2013)

Neither a pumped up eye-candy blockbuster, nor unnecessarily split emotions made in Spain, but it brings out the good from both. From the very first shots, you can see J.A. Bayona has talent, and the action sequence with the tsunami sweeps you away with its breathtaking visuals and uncompromising authenticity and clarity. The middle and final search part is a bit weaker in terms of both the script and pacing, but it still holds onto the necessary big emotions and, thanks to the capable director's hand, it doesn't slip into sentimentality, and when it does, only marginally, which can be endured. Naomi Watts is the best actress of our time. (15/07/2015)

A very, very, very good film. Strong, sensitive, appropriately dramatic and perhaps even authentic (or so it seemed). The performances of the adults and children were top-notch, the director conjured up almost "Malick-esque" moments at times (the meditative music also helped) and I blinked only a few times during the whole 113 minutes to make sure I would avoid missing anything. I really liked the fact that we learned only the bare essentials about the main characters at the beginning, and that the script avoided any flashbacks to the happy past or shots of the grieving relatives somewhere on the other side of the world. It is a pity that the DVD was a bit sloppy, because instead of the announced Czech subtitles and Czech subtitles for the deaf, it offered only the latter, and so I found the messages in square brackets quite distracting. For example, before the wave hit I read [strange sounds...] and then countless times [music...].__P.S. Do not read the content! (04/05/2014)

Bayona puts his previous experience with the horror genre to good use right from the beginning. The disconcerting musical motif and the method of filming (looking up from the depths) transform  the tranquil ocean surface into a sinister monster that may come to life in an unguarded moment. The fast-moving, screen-filling wave turns the master of creation into a defenceless being. The characters have nowhere to run, and we don’t either. Thanks to the rumbling sound effects, this is one of the most impressive images of destruction that I have “endured” at the cinema in recent years with respect to the visceral experience that it provides. The 3D glasses were paradoxically unnecessary. ___ After we and the characters are pummelled by the uncontrollable force of nature,   the film smoothly transitions into a family melodrama. The demonstration of brilliant special effects alternates with acting that is tenacious in both body and soul. Naomi Watts excels and she suffers the most of all the characters (perhaps because that’s how it happened in reality, or perhaps because she is a woman and this is a melodrama). She is supported superbly and without superfluous words by Tom Holland, who fits his role even better than Ewan McGregor, whose tense emotional state is obviously only a matter of acting. ___ The change in the eldest son’s behaviour shows how drastically such an extreme experience can alter one’s personal hierarchy of values. Material conveniences are suddenly needless, a cola can becomes a valuable treasure and children can no longer rely on the fact that adults will take care of everything necessary. The previous relationship hierarchy has become broken, roles have been reversed. ___ The simple idea of the importance of family cohesion and helping each other is consistently, though with (understandable) tendencies toward melodramatic excess, woven into the narrative, which brings a sense of urgency to the retelling of an eight-year-old story. We have to face the fact that our loved ones will be the only people to help us in the event of an economic (or other) collapse predicted by the sceptics. ___ The greatest tension in the film is created by delaying the moment of the scattered family members’ reunion. We anticipate the re-establishment of the initial harmony due to the logic of the melodrama genre, which Bayona was clearly well aware of and he does everything he can to make us unsure of whether the restoration of the status quo will happen too late. It’s thus not surprising that the emotional highlight of the film is in the form of a masterfully arranged scene of multiple characters passing each other in space. ___ I would venture to say that such an emotionally concise, superbly directed melodrama that makes full use of the privileges of the big screen has not appeared in cinemas at least since Titanic. 80% (30/01/2013)