Plots(1)

4th century A.D. Egypt under the Roman Empire… Violent religious upheaval in the streets of Alexandria spills over into the city’s famous Library. Trapped inside its walls, the brilliant astronomer Hypatia and her disciples fight to save the wisdom of the Ancient World… Among them, the two men competing for her heart: the witty, privileged Orestes and Davus, Hypatia’s young slave, who is torn between his secret love for her and the freedom he knows can be his if he chooses to join the unstoppable surge of the Christians. (Transmission Films)

(more)

Reviews (10)

3DD!3 

all reviews of this user

English The story is almost timeless and definitely manages to captivate, the setting is grandiose, and the actors, led by the beautiful (Miss Teacher) Rachel Weisz and the fanatical Ashraf Barhom are very good. Amenábar is good at telling stories, and despite sometimes trying too hard to manipulate situations to reflect current problems, he navigates the story with a firm hand. I really appreciated that the sub-plot was devoted to exploring the universe (thanks to that we have breathtaking footage from space) and one of the most remarkable libraries of the ancient world. ()

J*A*S*M 

all reviews of this user

English A beautiful historical film set in late antiquity Alexandria, featuring my beloved Rachel Weisz. The quality was a very pleasant surprise and the courage to show certain things full-on was also a shock. The world is still full of lunatics and if I were the godless Amenábar, I’d watch out very carefully for any stone flying in my direction. ()

Ads

Kaka 

all reviews of this user

English As two hours of history, it's okay, with solidly outlined battles both physically and spiritually. As a film, however, it fails. It's only bearable for two hours thanks to the lavish production design and solid philosophy, because it's hard to sympathise with the frigid Rachel Weisz on any level other than scientific, and the other characters are elusive. In addition, there are confusing fight scenes, inconsistent emotions, and an awkward outcome. Maybe, if they had thrown in some allegorical madness or a few sad looks, I would have thought it was directed by the chief philosopher Aronofsky. ()

kaylin 

all reviews of this user

English "Agora" is a film that deceives us a little by its appearance. Alejandro Amenábar is a director from whom we expect great things. A bit of artistic films that will captivate you. "Agora" will not disappoint in this sense, because it deals with a subject matter that you won't easily see in a film. After all, there aren't that many historical films that don't revolve around heroic and beautiful characters. Moreover, when we realize that the main character is a philosopher, something will seem a bit suspicious to you. But that says a lot, it really is a philosophical film, as well as a film about philosophy. More: http://www.filmovy-denik.cz/2013/02/agora-2009-65.html ()

NinadeL 

all reviews of this user

English On the one hand, I'm tired of a lot of movies taking place around the year 0, and Caesar or Jesus is at least mentioned everywhere. I was hoping for something completely different when they managed to make something set in 391 A.D., but in the end, it's just another old familiar clash on the theme of Quo Vadis - where do you go with Christianity now that religion is allowed? Unfortunately, the parallels with medieval obscurantism are many, and the story of Hypatia is as hopeless as Witchhammer. Maybe this is the way it was meant to be, but formally it's not that great, and aside from Rachel Weisz, there aren't any great actors to attract my empathy. ()

Gallery (197)