VOD (1)

Plots(1)

A hero steps forth, proclaiming his fame and his name. Beowulf! Slayer of monsters. Defender of the realm. He will kill the voracious beast ravaging the Viking land. He will claim gold and kingdom as his reward. But will his unchecked ambition ultimately demand a terrible toll of him? Ray Winstone, plays the heroic title role, and Angelina Jolie portrays the seductive mother of monsters in this epic tale set in a time of demons and dragons, warriors and temptresses. The lusty camaraderie. The battle with grotesque Grendel. The fiery death duel with the dragon. All here. All in a revolutionary new "performance capture" vision from filmmaker Robert Zemeckis. Hail, Beowulf, bravest of the brave! (Roadshow Entertainment)

(more)

Videos (5)

Trailer 3

Reviews (10)

POMO 

all reviews of this user

English Beowulf is visually stunning in all respects, with great music by Alan Silvestri, whether spectacular or dark, in Angelina Jolie’s cave. Also, the atmosphere of the film is so thick that it could be cut with a knife and the violence, sex and the overall maturity of the film are major pluses. These aspects make Beowulf an original and much livelier animated movie than the childish Polar Express. But there is one big but... these digital pictures just don’t have heart, no matter how hard they try. And at the moments when there is no Anthony Hopkins, Angelina or some monster, there’s nothing to watch. If Robert Zemeckis mastered the heart of digital animation, he might make better movies than Pixar. But he still has a lot to learn. ()

kaylin 

all reviews of this user

English Effort is good and it definitely counts, but the fact that it is a 3D animated film where the characters look quite realistic is not a factor that would really throw me off. I remember not liking it even in the cinema, and after watching it a second time, I can only confirm this. There are great action scenes, but they don't redeem it overall. ()

Ads

novoten 

all reviews of this user

English Just like the hero Beowulf, despite his bravery, is ultimately a toy in the hands of unpredictable fate, the transfer of his story to the big screen is a toy for Zemeckis and his team. A toy that is enticing for the audience and almost irresistible for some. However, it is unattainable for most of them. The creators played with it for so long that it became usable only for their own enjoyment. The race in the sea, the battle with the dragon, or the camera flyover from the king's hall to Grendel are scenes that will stay in my mind for months, but the story itself was shamefully lost among them. After all, Beowulf is an ancient legend that has inspired many famous works of fantasy. So why does it rely almost exclusively on pathetic speeches or vulgar (meaning crudely rough for the time) outbursts in the first half? I don't know if I would want to see a determined warrior in a live-action version, as such blunders would be even more pronounced. Additionally, despite the animation "filter," the actors are truly excellent, Winstone has charisma to spare, and even Alison Lohman, despite having limited screen time, can brighten up the fading ending with her traditional gentle beauty. But I still trust Zemeckis. I just can't shake off the fear that he won't ultimately deliver that perfectly combined story with revolutionary animation. ()

Marigold 

all reviews of this user

English The action sections are reminiscent of a slightly above-average computer game intro (although even here the creators could learn a lot, for example from the intro of The Witcher), the characters are inhumanely bulbous, the horses roll like fates, and the moments when emotions are supposed to radiate from the animation completely miss the mark. Which is actually a shame, because otherwise Beowulf is quite a nice and surprisingly not entirely clichéd heroic epic – if it is judged by the standards of Hollywood. It has decent music and a good atmosphere in places, but the animation absolutely fails with regard to reviving the world "offscreen". Beowulf is a horribly narrow film that lives only in a small section of the camera; otherwise, it resembles an indifferent thing that fatally lacks persuasiveness. ()

Othello 

all reviews of this user

English In terms of the script, Beowulf is surprisingly a very atypical and bold piece of work that is strangely unfocused (100% Gaiman's work) and enriches the heroic epic with the theme of bravado in the face of the awareness of one's own vulnerability. Unfortunately, that doesn't mean it's a well-written screenplay. Avary and Gaiman were dealt a "go wild!" card by Zemeckis during rewrites, saying that if a minute of film was going to cost a mega, let it be seen. Yet they failed to get two thirds of the film out of one pub and instead demonstrate their screenwriting freedom through one-liners like "My mighty lust limb can transport you to paradise, to ectasy, and back". A certain deliberate woodenness and naivety inherent in the myths, then, is the sort of thing that perhaps a classic filmstrip wouldn't pull off as well as a full-CGI one, which we naturally tend to see as a kind of stylization, though Zemeckis doesn't attempt much of one. Then again, the problem (see my review of The Polar Express) is that digital technology will always age rapidly, and today Beowulf already looks worse than interactive titles like Red Dead Redemption 2 or Witcher 3. ()

Gallery (53)